|
KMID : 1011420150200010067
|
|
Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
2015 Volume.20 No. 1 p.67 ~ p.73
|
|
|
Correlation of Near Stereoacuity and Phoria, and Refractive Error
|
|
심현석:Shim Hyun-Suk
김상현:Kim Sang-Hyun/김영청:Kim Young-Cheong
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: This study was investigated the relationship between the male and female of near stereoacuity and phoria, and was examined the correlations between near stereoacuity and phoria and refractive error.
Methods: Adult 83 (male 36, female 47, mean age 21.09±1.74(19~29) years old) target was examined after full correction
of refractive error. Near stereoacuity was measured by using Titmus-fly Stereotest(Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and RANDOT Stereotest (Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), phoria was measured by using modified torrington method, at distance 40 cm.
Results: In near stereoacuity, male was better good than female, and there was no difference between male and female (p>0.05). In near phoria, female was more higher than male, and there was a significant difference between male and female (p<0.05). Near stereoacuity by Titmus-fly test and Randot test result respectively was 262.17±562.43 sec (second of arc) 243.08±68.04 sec in esophoria, 148.42±269.54 sec, 107.40±263.74 sec in orthophoria, 113.94±152.46 sec, 79.70±136.83 sec in exophoria, there was a no difference between three phoria groups (p>0.05), and was a high correlation between phoria and near stereoacity(r=0.68). In addition, near stereoacuity in the refractive error respectively was 80.00± 571.43 sec, 68.75±36.82 sec in myopia, 133.57±224.15 sec, 93.14±214.95 sec in hyperopia, 511.20±855.00 sec, 511.4±855.60 sec, there was a significant difference between three phoria groups (p<0.05). when was classfiied near stersoacuity into degree of refractive error, near stersoacuity was best in emmetropia, and was reduced when refractive error was highest in high degree myopia, and hyperopia.
Conclusions: Titmus-fly Stereotest and RANDOT Stereotest result, near stereoacuity of adults, when esophoria and high degree refractive error, was reduced, there was a relationship between near stereoacuity with phoria, and refractive error. In this both stereotests if was bad when near stereoacuity can expect a phoria and refractive error.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Near stereoacuity, Titmus-fly stereotest, RANDOT stereotest, Phoria, Esophoria, Refractive error
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|